CBC
Guide · The two documents

Schedule of Condition vs dilapidations

A Schedule of Condition is the document at the start of the lease. A Schedule of Dilapidations is the document at the end. The first defines the baseline; the second measures the gap. They are complementary, and the absence of the first materially weakens the position of every party at the second.

Author
CBC Surveyors
Updated
Updated 2025
Reading time
8 min read

Overview

The two documents are often confused. They serve different purposes, are prepared at different points in the lease, and trigger different professional duties. Below: what each one is, when it appears, and how the first shapes the second.

Schedule of Condition, the baseline

Prepared before the lease is executed. A factual evidential record of the demise's condition at lease grant. Appended to the executed lease and referenced in the repairing covenant. Its purpose is to fix the contractual baseline against which repairing obligations are later measured.

Schedule of Dilapidations, the claim

Prepared at or shortly before lease end (interim dilapidations are also possible during the term). A schedule of breaches of the lease's repairing, decorating and reinstatement covenants, supported by a costed remedial works section. Served by the landlord on the tenant; the basis on which damages are negotiated.

How the two documents relate

The Schedule of Condition fixes the lower limit. The Schedule of Dilapidations identifies the alleged shortfall against the lease covenants. Where a Schedule of Condition is in place, the dilapidations claim is reduced by the items that were already evident at lease grant.

What happens at dilapidations without a Schedule of Condition

Without a Schedule of Condition, the tenant's repairing obligation is unqualified, measured against the standard of a property of similar age and character. The dilapidations surveyor on each side then has to construct a retrospective view of what the demise looked like at lease grant. That retrospective view is contestable, evidence-light, and almost always to the disadvantage of one party.

Section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, a brief note

Damages for a breach of the repairing covenant at lease end are statutorily capped by reference to the diminution in the value of the reversion (Section 18(1), Landlord and Tenant Act 1927). The Schedule of Condition is not the only document relevant here, but it is the one that most directly evidences the condition the landlord let, and therefore the value the landlord could fairly expect on yield-up.

Key takeaways

What to remember

  • 01Schedule of Condition = baseline at lease grant. Schedule of Dilapidations = claim at lease end.
  • 02Without a Schedule of Condition, the dilapidations claim is measured against an unqualified standard.
  • 03The Schedule of Condition reduces the dilapidations claim by the items evident at grant.
  • 04Section 18 of the LTA 1927 is also relevant, the schedule helps evidence the diminution position.
  • 05Specialist preparation of the original schedule is consistently the most cost-effective dilapidations defence.
Common questions

Frequently asked

Start your enquiry

Talk to a Schedule of Condition specialist

Send a brief and we will respond the same working day with a fixed quote and indicative timescales.

Get a Quote